http://www.kumite.com/myths
Computer Virus Myths home page
Your CIO can reduce virus hoaxes in your firm. Here's how

Announcing the "John McAfee" Awards for Computer Virus Hysteria (version 2.0)

Computer Virus Myths home page These awards are named after McAfee Associates Inc. founder John McAfee, who single-handedly set the standard for virus hysteria in 1988. The mainstream media cried out for a telegenic messiah -- and McAfee lowered himself to the challenge. His doom & gloom statements delighted reporters, panicked the computing world, and pushed his company's software to the top of the charts.

Sadly, John McAfee fell from the media's grace after the Michelangelo fiasco of 1992. Associated Press, Reuters, United Press International, and CNN (among many others) suffered incredible blows to their journalistic reputations. Needing a scapegoat to cover up their own incompetent reporting, these agencies chose poor old McAfee -- they dumped him like Princess Diana dumped Prince Charles.

John McAfee left the industry in disgrace. But he wrote the book on virus hype ("Computer Viruses, Worms, Data Diddlers, Killer Programs, and Other Threats to Your System," 1989, St. Martin's Press) and a new legion of followers relentlessly beats the drum of hysteria in his name.

How we picked the 1997 nominees

Crypt Newsletter editor George C. Smith and virus myths researcher Rob Rosenberger picked the nominees after a long, thorough process. We'd love to give you the details, but, um, the NSA swore us to secrecy.

How we picked the winners

That's where you came in! Internet users cast their ballots for the person, company, reporter, hoax, and event they thought deserve a Computer Virus Hysteria award. Voting took place throughout May '97. The judges' decisions are final, so please don't argue with us if you won.

What do the winners get as a prize?

We honestly want to extend computer literacy. So, each winner receives a book on computer viruses, computer security, or the culture of the Internet. This way they can figure out what's going on in the world of computers!
Our thanks go to Nicole Judy of Ohio who offered $50 to help defray the cost of prizes. (The rest comes out of George & Rob's pockets.) We appreciate your kindness, Judy!

What do the runners-up get?

Each runner-up receives a special "reality check" worth actual money -- in the form of a prepaid calling card. That way, they can dial somebody who really knows what he's talking about.

What do the judges get?

We get publicity. Seriously! The more people who drop by to vote, the more we enlighten them about computer virus myths & misconceptions & propaganda & hoaxes.

And the winners are...

Government category

The Winner!
David L. Carter, Ph.D. and Andra J. Katz, Ph.D. (87 votes)

These law professors wrote a feature article on computer crime for the FBI's Law and Enforcement Bulletin. In it, they cited five -- yes, five! -- virus jokes as the real thing. These "new insidious viruses" include: The professors later reference one of the jokes, claiming "[certain] employees typically introduce a virus to play with the system without intending to cause permanent damage, as in the case of the 'Clinton' virus."

Incredibly, this gaffe slipped past the bulletin's editors who work at the FBI training academy in Quantico, Virginia. They later removed the most embarrassing portion from the online copy of the report after Crypt Newsletter exposed it in an editorial -- but the FBI oddly left the reference to "the case of the 'Clinton' virus." And tens of thousands of original printed copies went out the door with no possibility of recall.

Let the record show: the FBI published a condensed version of the Carter/Katz report. The full report identifies an April Fool's story (printed in Datamation magazine) as the source for its information on the joke viruses.

Even more bizarre: Dr. Katz apparently learned of this gaffe almost a year beforehand. Computer security expert Gene Spafford claims he received a press release about the report which "contained the same erroneous statements about joke computer viruses that were printed in the FBI newsletter... I explained to [Dr. Katz] that they should correct [the report] immediately or else face ridicule from those who understood viruses. I never heard from them again."

Joint Chiefs of Staff computer office (43 votes)

The "J6" directorate serves as a focal point for the Joint Chiefs of Staff in matters of command & control, communications, and computers. In early January, the "J6Z" branch sent a priority message to every military office around the world warning them of deadly new computer viruses. The message claimed Word macro viruses can "destroy hard drives, or at a minimum, data on hard drives." It also claimed "many virus detection packages do not detect or eradicate" the Wazzu virus.

Military network administrators got swamped with email from frightened users who wanted software that could detect viruses. This prompted some of the more frustrated administrators to ask users to ignore the worldwide alert. Incredibly, JCS J6Z claims it coordinated their bizarre message with the DISA ASSIST office.

The Moynihan Commission (31 votes)

As chairman of a major Senate commission looking into government secrecy, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan and his crew released a report touting the Penpal Greetings hoax as a genuine virus threat. You can read the scathing editorial about it and check out the embarrassing chapter for yourself, but we'll summarize it for you here. The report boldly displays this boxed-out paragraph on p.109:
Friendly Greetings?

One company whose officials met with the Commission warned its employees against reading an e-mail entitled Penpal Greetings. Although the message appeared to be a friendly letter, it contained a virus that could infect the hard drive and destroy all data present. The virus was self-replicating, which meant that once the message was read, it would automatically forward itself to any e-mail address stored in the recipients in-box.

Commission staffer Alison Fortier (a former senior director for National Security Council legislative affairs) proved instrumental in writing the embarrassing chapter. When Crypt Newsletter contacted her, she at first expressed disbelief that Penpal was only a hoax!

Other commission members who signed the report include vice-chairman Larry Combest, Senator Jesse Helms, ex-CIA director John Deutch, and Martin Faga, formerly a bigwig at the ultra-secret National Reconnaissance Office.

Dr. Bernard Rostker (21 votes)

The defense department "replaced" (read: "fired") this Special Assistant for Gulf War Illnesses after his team turned over a draft report to the Senate Armed Services Committee. Senate investigators want to see logs kept on the destruction of Iraqi weapons during the Gulf War -- but Rostker's team couldn't locate most of the logs, so they assume a computer virus destroyed roughly half the electronic copies.

Rostker's team couldn't find paper copies of the logs either, but the media didn't really care about such a trivial issue. International newswires gave prominent attention to the portion of the story dealing with viruses.

(return to top)

Corporate category

The Winner!
McAfee headquarters (62 votes)

McAfee Associates goes to a lot of effort to keep the world virus-free. For example, they pay employees to beta-test rivals' products. This fact recently came to light when McAfee launched a two-pronged media assault against Symantec and Dr. Solomon's Software. You can read a scathing opinion piece about it, but we'll summarize it for you here.

In the first case, McAfee's beta-test division discovered an obscure flaw in Symantec's Norton Utilities. Instead of notifying Symantec, McAfee chose to notify only the media. They even wrote a blatant demonstration program for Windows Sources magazine (itself a runner-up in the "journalism" category), which they gladly posted on their website so any malicious hacker could download it.

In the second case, McAfee's beta-test division discovered a supposed "cheat mode" in Dr. Solomon's Anti-Virus Toolkit. McAfee went on the war path, paying PRNewswire (itself the winner in the "journalism" category) to distribute multiple press releases describing Solomon's heinous crimes against humanity.

Just another day in McAfee's relentless effort to protect the world. Solomon's struck back at McAfee and won the media battle. Symantec (itself a runner-up in this category) lost their media battle, but they later slapped McAfee with a copyright infringement lawsuit as payback.

Microsoft (44 votes)

A third-party developer downloaded a "marketing white paper" from Microsoft's website when Word97 made its debut early this year. Ironically, the downloaded file contained a variant of the Wazzu virus. Even more ironic: it contained the first known macro virus specific to Word97.

The developer claims Microsoft reacted quickly when he notified them. "To their credit, they pulled [the infected template file] within minutes." But not even Bill Gates himself could stop the negative publicity when computer publications learned of Microsoft's role in releasing the first Word97 virus.

Penguin Press (30 votes)

This publishing firm wanted to publicize a new interactive novel called Irina. Company bigwig Guy Gadney (himself a runner-up in the "quotation" category) came up with a brilliant idea -- he sent letters to the media warning of a deadly new "Irina" virus, and in the process he accidentally gave birth to the Irina hoax (itself a runner-up in the "alert" category).

Oddly, the publicity stunt failed to include essential information on how to contact Penguin Press, which forced a virus researcher to trace it back to them. Shocked by intense negative publicity, the company later tried to cover up its involvement in the hoax.

Symantec "news bureau" (16 votes)

Antivirus companies enjoy valuable free publicity. They spend a lot on advertising of course, but they'd much rather get mentioned in a news story at no cost to them. Every time a virus appears, antivirus firms compete to get quoted in print or to frown on cue for the camera. This adds up to millions of dollars in free advertising.

Few reporters lift a finger when they write virus stories -- they merely wait for press releases to show up on PRNewswire (itself the winner in the "journalism" category). Symantec doesn't like this because it forces them to compete for publicity. They want reporters to come to Symantec just like Pavlov's dogs.

Early this year, Symantec made it even easier for reporters to get their daily dose of propaganda. They issued a press release with the headline, "Symantec Announces the Opening of the Symantec Antivirus Research Centre (SARC) News Bureau for the Media." (Notice how the American conglomerate uses a proper British spelling for the word "centre.")

Symantec's propaganda outlet will serve as "an information center for the media only... Editors and [TV show] producers will be able to contact the SARC News Bureau via a special toll-free 1-888 number to obtain information on topical issues such as... easy anti-virus protection through Norton AntiVirus products."

The press release quotes SARC product manager Alex Haddox, who said "by offering the media a 1-888 toll-free number for easy access to SARC spokespersons, they will be able to obtain the very latest information on viruses and we will be able to spread the word." (Emphasis added by the CVHA nomination committee.)

Now, you'd think a press release written specifically for editors wouldn't need a special "note to editors" paragraph at the bottom, right? Wrong! "If you would like additional information on Symantec Corporation and its products, please view... SymantecÕs [sic] Website."

Ziff-Davis ZDNet division (16 votes)

Why does Ziff-Davis, a computer publications giant, appear in the "corporate" category? Well, they recently ventured into the antivirus business. True! A recent ZDNet press release "announced the discovery of, and cure for, a previously unknown and undetectable computer virus that can destroy many of the most common types of PC files."

According to the press release, employees noticed executable files increasing in size -- indicating a virus infiltrated ZDNet's computers. (Notice how this "undetectable" virus exhibits an easily detectable trait.) ZDNet turned to Symantec and Dr. Solomon's Software for assistance. Symantec "sprung into action" and Solomon's "provided ZDNet the means to ensure the integrity of their data."

Hold on, it gets even better. As a reward for discovering this new virus, ZDNet negotiated an exclusive distribution license with Symantec & Solomon's. Don't bother looking for help anywhere else if you want to check your computer for this deadly virus. The files are "available via free download exclusively at the ZDNet Software Library." Click to see large version! (42k)

McAfee Russian division (11 votes)

McAfee Associates' Moscow office faxed a bilingual "security alert" claiming they "received an alert about a message being sent around the world on the Internet. If you receive a message with the subject 'Irina' DO NOT OPEN IT. The virus contained in the message will rewrite your hard drive. Please warn your friends!"

The Irina virus, as you may know, is a runner-up in the "alert" category. And remember: we named the Virus Hysteria Awards in honor of John McAfee, the man who founded McAfee Associates.

PowerQuest (5 votes)

The makers of PartitionMagic paid PRNewswire to distribute an intriguing press release when various IE bugs came to light earlier this year. "This security scare highlights yet another argument for [buying PartitionMagic]," the company claims. VP Robert Raymond explains: "Hackers, as well as viruses, will go for the obvious. If all of the PC user's files are in one C: partition, that gives the hacker or virus quicker access. [Partitioning] presents a structure that the majority of current hackers and viruses do not anticipate, and may not successfully 'hack' or 'infect.' "

Raymond goes on to say "if you have a separate 'operating system' partition... your other operating system partitions are hidden and are much safer from virus attack."

(return to top)

World leader category

The Winner!
McAfee Associates (100 votes)

From a 2/6/97 press release:
"as the world's leading vendor of anti-virus software, McAfee is considered the computer industry's Center for Disease Control..."

Symantec (24 votes)

From a 2/10/97 press release (which is itself a runner-up in the "corporate" category):
"the world's leading supplier of utilities and anti-virus software products..."

Computer Associates (17 votes)

(They recently purchased Cheyenne Software.) From a 1/22/97 press release:
"the world leader in mission-critical business software..."

Dr. Solomon's (15 votes)

From a 2/10/97 press release:
"the worldwide leader in computer virus detection identification and disinfection..."

Touchstone (7 votes)

From a 2/19/97 press release:
"a leading developer of innovative software designed to help people use complex technologies..."

Trend Micro (6 votes)

From a 1/27/97 press release:
"the leading developer of server-based virus protection for high-performance corporate networks..."

Data Fellows (4 votes)

From a 3/17/97 press release:
"a technology leader in its major business areas of anti-virus, data security and cryptography software..."

EliaShim (4 votes)

From a page on their website, obtained 4/9/97 :
"the leading supplier of technologically innovative anti-virus and security software to the corporate and government sectors worldwide..."

Sophos (no votes)

From a 4/2/97 press release:
"one of the world's leading developers of anti-virus software..."
(return to top)

Quotation category

1997 was "the year of the virus definition," as you'll soon see...

The Winner!
Symantec (40 votes)

Give Symantec credit for truth-in-paid-advertising. This quote appears near the bottom of their recent "Bloodhound Technology" announcement:
"The press release contains forward-looking statements concerning product development efforts by Symantec. There are certain important factors that could cause Symantec's future development efforts to differ materially from those anticipated by some of the statements made above..."

Laura E. Quarantiello (25 votes)

This author's new book, Cyber Crime: How to Protect Yourself From Computer Criminals, created quite a splash with the nomination committee. For example, her chapter on viruses quoted John McAfee as head of the "Computer Virus Industry Association" eight years after it was exposed as one of his many publicity gimmicks. (Remember, we named the Virus Hysteria Awards in honor of John McAfee.) Quarantiello sums up her entire book in the first nine words of the preface:
"I'm not a hacker but I know a few..."

Integralis (24 votes)

The company touted its MIMEsweeper v3.0 product with an anonymously written white paper. This otherwise boring document coined a spectacular new verb/noun set which eventually found its way into the Australian Financial Review. We think the definitions speak for themselves:
"Cyberwoozling is the practice of siphoning data from the user's system whilst they surf the net. Cyberwoozles are generally a combination of cookies and browser side add-in code."

Eric Greenberg (22 votes)

Reporters flocked to Netscape's senior security product manager when various IE bugs came to light earlier this year. Supposedly, a malicious hacker could exploit these bugs to send deadly viruses to your computer. Greenberg's company avoided negative publicity a year ago when fearmongers discovered an even more threatening bug in Netscape software -- but Greenberg conveniently forgot this fact when he stabbed Microsoft in the back:
"We have never had a security hole in our products on the magnitude of [the Internet Explorer] security hole... We're less prone to this sort of thing."

Duane Andrews (21 votes)

President Clinton named this former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence to chair a special "Information Warfare - Defense task force." Interviewed after his committee issued its report, Andrews said he wants to give the Defense Department the authority to spread viruses:
"[Let the military inject attackers' computers with] a polymorphic virus that wipes out the system, takes it down for weeks."

Marc Gosselin (16 votes)

A Corporal in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police computer crime investigation unit, Gosselin found himself knee-deep in the worldwide publicity surrounding the SexyGirls.com scam (itself the winner in the "event" category). Mind you, this scam has absolutely nothing to do with computer viruses -- it's not even a "worm" by definition. It's just a generic Trojan horse involving a porno company. Gosselin mixed up his definitions:
"We call it a Trojan virus. Basically, you're downloading a program for a specific purpose, and it's doing something different from what it's supposed to do."

Guy Gadney (15 votes)

This former head of publishing at Penguin Press (itself a runner-up in the "corporate" category) accidentally launched the Irina virus hoax (itself a runner-up in the "alert" category) as a publicity stunt for a new interactive novel. Shocked by the intense negative publicity, Gadney later tried to cover up his [company's] involvement:
"The virus rumour has been checked by experts in the UK and it has been confirmed that there is currently no 'Irina' virus to guard against and that an email erroneously circulated to a mailing list was at the root of this rumour."

Brian Milburn (10 votes)

This president of Solid Oak Software receives quite a bit of media publicity thanks to CYBERsitter, his firm's flagship software product. CYBERsitter blocks sites considered "unsuitable" for children, such as the SexyGirls.com website (itself the winner in the "event" category). Mind you, the SexyGirls.com scam has absolutely nothing to do with computer viruses -- it's not even a "worm" by definition. It's just a generic Trojan horse involving a porno company. When the scam came to light, Milburn suddenly turned into a virus expert:
"This is potentially a new classification of virus... [I'm making it my] top priority."

David L. Potter (2 votes)

An electrical engineer in the Army's Communications Electronics Command, Potter used the obligatory military phrase "information warfare" in the title of a blathering paper about computer viruses. He offers this insightful view on the definition of a computer virus:
"Although the term 'virus' is used to refer to malicious software code in general..."
(return to top)

Event category

The Winner!
SexyGirls.com Trojan virus international porno scam modem-based con game (53 votes)

Whoops, sorry. We got carried away with the title of this event. But although we admit it, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police don't admit it. RCMP officials learned some Internet users had racked up large phone bills to a company buried in the old Soviet Union. An investigation uncovered a Trojan horse tied to an international phone scam.

Internet users interested in pornography would download the Trojan (described as a graphics image viewer), install it on their computers, and then the scam would begin. The software would quietly hang up the phone and dial a number in Moldova, generating lucrative long-distance charges. The unwitting caller would re-connect to the Internet via a service provider in Canada.

Okay, so we know the software doesn't qualify as a virus or a worm. It's just a generic Trojan horse involving a porno company. Why did this event make the Computer Virus Hysteria Awards? Well, that's where the Mounties and an Internet content-blocking company come in.

Corporal Marc Gosselin (himself a runner-up in the "quotation" category) works in the RCMP computer crime division. He found himself the center of media attention when SexyGirls.com came to light. Gosselin ignored traditional computer crime definitions when he called the software a "Trojan virus."

Now enter Solid Oak Software president Brian Milburn (also a runner-up in the "quotation" category). His company markets software which shields children from pornographic sites. Milburn described the SexyGirls.com scam as "a new classification of virus" and declared his company would make computer viruses its "top priority."

The media latched onto Gosselin's & Milburn's statements with gusto. Reporters never bothered to quote genuine virus experts about the scam; all virus references came from pseudo-experts. This brought it under the auspices of the Computer Virus Hysteria Awards.

By the way, did you notice the questions reporters failed to ask people who got caught up in this Trojan virus international porno scam modem-based con game?

Valentine's Day Massacre (42 votes)

"I started the AOL riot of 1997," begins David Cassel in an opinion piece. "The whole thing began on my mailing list when a snooty story went out about an e-mailed threat..." The email claimed hackers around the globe would unite on Valentine's Day to destroy AOL. "Among plans of revolters are mail bombs, viruses, ..."

Cassel spread word of the upcoming disaster in The AOL List, a mailing list with a serious editorial slant against America Online. News agencies (both print- and web-based) picked up on it and gave Cassel his obligatory fifteen nanominutes of fame. c|net reporter Janet Kornblum filed an online story saying Cassel considered it a genuine threat.

The alert quickly evolved. Users soon received warnings of a global hacker riot (a sympathetic strike from non-AOL hackers?) coming on Valentine's Day which "may destroy the entire infrastructure" of the Internet according to one hysterical user.

In the end, Valentine's Day left no profound mark on the Internet. According to Cassel, a few hundred wannabee hackers logged onto AOL to argue whether they should destroy AOL. Ironically, their anarchistic plans got bogged down by Robert's Rules of Order. Some childish individuals used well-known parlor tricks to annoy users; otherwise, the day ended as AOL predicted, not as Cassel predicted.

A follow-up story in Wired summed it up in one word: "amateurs." Cassel now rationalizes the event flopped because it "had little to do with hackers." Oh, really? "It was a folk protest... Malcontents gathered [on AOL] to 'voice their angst, their anger and their dissatisfaction' " with the nation's largest online service.

Symantec Virus Awareness Month Retail Promotion (39 votes)

The driven marketing managers at Symantec issued a press release declaring February 15th - March 15th as 'National Virus Awareness Month Retail Promotion.' It's not really a "month" by definition, but let's not debate obscure technicalities.

Riding high on Michelangelo's fifth anniversary (itself a runner-up in the "event" category), Symantec issued its press release with a catchy subtitle: "Virus Awareness Month Promotion Includes National Advertising, Retail Demo Days, Product Rebates, Channel Promotions, an Electronic SARC News Update for Customers and SARC News Bureau for Media." (Symantec's "news bureau" is itself a runner-up in the "corporate" category.)

This prestigious promotional event goaded Crypt Newsletter and the Computer Virus Myths home page to proclaim March 'Symantec Awareness Month' (March 1-31 to be specific), which ended quite appropriately on April Fool's Day.

Fifth annual Michelangelo Hysteria Day (28 votes)

The fifth anniversary of Michelangelo's trigger date came and went with no noticeable effect. Dr. Solomon's, IBM, Stiller Research, McAfee, Cheyenne, and Seven Locks reported in with a grand total of zero confirmed attacks worldwide on 6 March. This didn't prevent some people from offering "emergency" advice, though. Recommendations ranged from the typical ("set your clock ahead one day") to the deluded ("turn off your computer").

A couple of antivirus vendors jumped on the bandwagon with press releases. Most notable: McAfee Associates (itself the winner in the "corporate" category). They issued a "Michelangelo virus advisory" describing their diligence: "McAfee has made free trial versions of its antivirus software available to the public" (actually, they started offering free trial versions in the late 1980s).

McAfee also "launched a Michelangelo-specific support forum on its web page; extended its customer support hours; added a new high capacity phone line; and implemented a free automated faxback service" for anyone who didn't obtain enough information about Michelangelo in the last five years.

The Associated Press suffered an incredible blow to its reputation in 1992 with its doomsday predictions for the Michelangelo virus. (Reporter Laura Myers is a runner-up in the "journalism" category.) AP's "Today in History" column for 1997 marked Michelangelo's fifth anniversary with a beautifully understated comment:

"Five years ago: Personal computer users braced for a virus known as Michelangelo, set to trigger on March 6, but only scattered cases of lost files were reported."
Wired magazine thankfully published a timely analysis showing why Michelangelo lost its impact over the years.

MS-Mail specific ShareFun virus scare (11 votes)

Viruses propagate themselves in numerous ways. Now at last a virus exists with the code necessary to propagate itself via email. McAfee Associates (itself the winner in the "corporate" category) discovered the ShareFun virus and paid PRNewswire to distribute an announcement about it.

Then again, what really makes this virus so "new"? The Christmas Tree worm of 1987 used the same technique; the Morris Internet worm of 1988 used a roughly similar technique. And remember: ShareFun self-propagates only if you use MS-Mail. Do you use MS-Mail?

Linux specific Bliss virus scare (10 votes)

Viruses exist for a number of operating systems. Now at last they exist for the Linux operating system. McAfee Associates (itself the winner in the "corporate" category) discovered the Bliss virus and paid PRNewswire to distribute an announcement about it. Frightened users wondered if virus authors would learn new tricks by attacking a supposedly secure operating system.

Need we say it? Most PCs run one of Microsoft's operating systems -- DOS, Windows 3.x, Windows 95, or Windows NT. Others use IBM's OS/2, Macintosh System 7.5, and so forth. The Bliss virus requires the Linux operating system.

(return to top)

Alert category

Most hoaxsters seem content just to write a cheap rip-off of the original Good Times alert. What, no imagination?

The Winner!
AOL4FREE alert (62 votes)

It's a hoax. Then again, some fool could write a virus somewhat like it. So let's call it a probable urban legend. No wait, we found a Trojan horse...

Researchers scratch their heads over the "popularity" of the AOL4FREE chain-letter campaign. You'd think some people would learn by now... Like the Good Times alert, AOL4FREE warnings scream your computer will die if you so much as read an offending message with your eyeballs. Also like Good Times, you can spot an offending message because it contains a key phrase in the subject line. (Many users ironically include the offending phrase in their own warnings when forwarding it to others.)

Even more stunning -- dozens, perhaps hundreds, of users claimed they got hit by the magical AOL4FREE virus. When asked about it, though, these same people confessed they "cleaned up" someone else's alert to make it more presentable. The very first paragraph of the alert says "I got hit by this virus," which of course makes everyone think the sender of the message got hit.

Antivirus companies exposed it as a hoax on their websites in order to quell the worldwide hysteria... Then suddenly U.S. DoE CIAC issued Alert H-47 about a Trojan horse (not a virus) named AOL4FREE.COM. David Crawford maintains CIAC's website and he knew H-47 would throw gasoline on the chain-letter hysteria. However, CIAC had no choice but to issue an alert according to its charter.

Need we say it? The media went positively berserk over Alert H-47. International newswires wrote stories of doom & gloom, web-based newswires wrote front-page virus alerts, and hysterical users quoted the entire H-47 alert in their chain letters.

Good Times alert (42 votes)

A very potent virus alert -- it surfaced in 1994 and gave birth to many of the other alerts you see here. The Good Times alert also popularized the myth which says your computer can get infected if you read an offending message with your eyeballs. How can you identify a dangerous message before reading it? It includes the phrase "Good Times" in the subject line, of course. Many naïve users ironically include the offending phrase in the subject line of their own warning messages.

Penpal Greetings alert (20 votes)

Basically just a cheap rip-off of the Good Times virus, but U.S. government & military users seem infatuated with it. Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (himself a runner-up in the "government" category) released a major report identifying the Penpal virus as genuine, for example.

The original Penpal Greetings alert died down for awhile ... but it came roaring back to life when a variant sprung up. "This information was received this morning from IBM," the new incarnation claimed. Numerous Internet service providers (ISPs) got sucked in by this statement -- we even hotlinked to one ISP's alert, but they took it down soon after the CVHA v2.0 voting began. (Go figure.)

NaughtyRobot alert (14 votes)

Most hoaxes seem childish compared to NaughtyRobot. You see, most hoaxes warn you of some hideous new virus which can do all sorts of magical things. NaughtyRobot takes a different path -- the message claims it is the hideous new magical beast. "This message was sent to you by NaughtyRobot, an Internet spider that crawls into your server through a tiny hole in the World Wide Web..."

The perpetrator of this hoax used an ancient, well-known trick to spoof recipients' Internet addresses, thus making it look like they sent the message to themselves. This trick convinced many unknowing users of NaughtyRobot's "existence." They in turn launched all the chain-letter warning messages.

Deeyenda Maddick alert (10 votes)

This horrible virus does everything its grandfather (the original Good Times virus) can do, and a lot more. Try to pronounce its name slowly. Think about it. Just let your dirty little mind wander if you don't get the joke immediately.

Irina alert (10 votes)

This hoax actually started out as a publicity stunt for Penguin Press (itself a runner-up in the "corporate" category). As part of the stunt, the company mailed fake "Irina virus alert" letters to British newspapers. Unfortunately, those letters failed to mention Penguin Press as a point of contact!

Many reporters took the publicity stunt for real -- and someone sent the "alert" via email to friends. It quickly spiraled out of control, turning into a worldwide chain letter.

Little Drummer Boy alert (10 votes)

This hilarious Christmas spoof from Garrison Keillor's Prairie Home Companion warns of a deadly computer virus which can blow up your car and make aircraft fall from the sky. Indeed, this computer virus can even take over humans' bodies! Any electronic device automatically gets infected if you play the second stanza of the song "The Little Drummer Boy" within earshot.

Death69 alert (7 votes)

The first computer virus to exhibit hunger pangs! "It first formats the hard drive, then it physically eats at the materials of the drive..." Also known as the Death-Blaze virus.

Ghost alert (7 votes)

McAfee Associates (itself the winner in the "corporate" category) got swept up by an urban legend surrounding a legitimate program. They christened it the GhostFriday.Trojan and issued a beta package to detect it. McAfee eventually stopped calling it a Trojan horse when virus experts ridiculed them for it.

McAfee-induced hysteria surfaced again last December thanks to a chain letter announcing Friday the 13th -- the day when the Ghost program allegedly wipes out hard disks.

PKZ300B alert (7 votes)

Another old favorite. Rumors have circulated since at least 1992 about this deadly "Trojan/virus." It seems like a new version of this alert comes out whenever a new version of PKZIP software comes out.

Valentine's Greetings alert (2 votes)

Don't confuse this with the Valentine's Day Massacre (itself a runner-up in the "event" category). The Valentine's Greetings alert is an almost-verbatim rip-off of the Penpal Greetings alert, which is itself just a cheap rip-off of the Good Times alert. Some fool probably just got tired of receiving Valentine's email greetings...

Bisquit alert (1 vote)

This relatively obscure hoax alert came disguised as a "CERT/CC" message describing a vicious new Java virus. Basically, you can kiss your PC bye-bye if you dare to surf the web with a Java-enabled web browser. Bisquit's god-like power to destroy computers rivals those of the omnipotent Deeyenda virus.

Matra R-440 Crotale alert (1 vote)

"The worlds [sic] first multi-platform, multi-environment, and multi-systems virus surfaced in Missouri on March 14, 1997." So states a warning (or should we say press release?) about the dangerous Matra virus. "It can infect any system and any OS and any chipset..."

Matra plagiarizes other virus hoaxes including Deeyenda and modem subcarrier. It also spouts key phrases from legitimate alerts to make it sound a little more plausible.

Red Alert alert (1 vote)

This elaborate warning claims a DataFellows employee confirmed the existence of the first home-page virus -- and according to the hoax alert, the virus appeared on Microsoft's home page. "Stay off Microsoft's home page until further notice," it warns. The perpetrator of this hoax put a lot of effort into making DataFellows look foolish.

Sheep alert (no votes)

This alert surfaced at roughly the same time as the Ghost alert and it, too, warns people to avoid a legitimate (pirated) program. Perhaps someone received a copy of the software and got confused, or perhaps a manager started rumors to convince workers to stop playing with it.
(return to top)

Pierre Salinger award for investigative journalism

The Winner!
PRNewswire (49 votes)

This international newswire serves as a clearinghouse for corporate and institutional press releases, especially those issued by the anti-virus industry. What you may not know is that most "virus warnings" are now generated through PRNewswire via company-written propaganda.

Large corporate players in the antivirus industry distribute "virus alerts" via PRNewswire for a couple of fairly obvious (and profoundly anti-consumer) reasons. First, editors and reporters don't pay much attention to Internet newsgroups which have historically served this function. And if editors & reporters don't pay attention, antivirus companies can't get their names mentioned in news stories.

Second, users learn about legitimate threats to computing via Internet channels but there's no money in the process for corporate antivirus vendors. Other competitors can freely critique & snipe, users can freely spit back at distorted pronouncements, and there's little stimulus to corporate sales to show for it. General warnings distributed through the Internet pick up a lot of debate as extra baggage.

PRNewswire proves a cost-effective way to market a "virus alert." At $500 for every 400 words, company mouthpieces can write whatever they want and ensure it rapidly arrives in the hands of pliant journalists. Lazy editors & reporters rely on PRNewswire for their stories instead of relying on industry contacts.

More often than not, a virus story will erupt as "breaking news" solely because anti-virus companies paid PRNewswire to distribute press releases about it. Two recent examples include the Hare media fiasco of 1996 and the Bliss virus scare (itself a runner-up in the "event" category).

John M. Broder, Laurence Zuckerman (48 votes)

These reporters for the New York Times wrote a story about the horrible devastation awaiting us in three years -- all thanks to "the year 2000 problem or the millennium virus, as it is also called."

Mason Shoes, a company woefully highlighted in the story, purchased a new computer not long ago and transferred their old software to it as a way to save money. "But the immigrant Cobol [sic] code brought with it a deadly stowaway -- the year 2000 virus," the reporters claim.

Old COBOL programmers apparently came out of retirement to fight the insidious millennium virus. Many of them "now demand annual salaries of $100,000 to $200,000." Such high fees just to fight a virus the world has known about for decades?

According to the story, Mason Shoes "is looking for someone to blame for [their] year 2000 hassles -- the companies that sold [the] hardware, the technicians who installed the applications programs, the itinerant programmers who customized them..." Translation: a worldwide conspiracy surrounds the millennium virus.

Interestingly, Broder & Zuckerman noted an inaccuracy in the name of the dangerous millennium virus -- it triggers in the year 2000 but "the millennium technically does not begin until 2001." They never mentioned the inaccuracy of calling it a virus, though.

Laura Myers (29 votes)

This Associated Press staff writer made a name for herself in 1992's Michelangelo media fiasco when her reporting helped destroy the newswire's credibility. Well, she's back! Five years later almost to the day, AP let her mention viruses in a story.

And what a story! Writing about the Gulf War Illness controversy (itself a runner-up in the "government" category), Myers implied the missing electronic files and paper documents "were apparently wiped out by a computer virus."

David Berlind, Joe Moran (26 votes)

McAfee Associates won in the "corporate" category for their recent media assault against Symantec. However, they couldn't have done it without the help of two reporters at Windows Sources.

Berlind & Moran wrote a fright-filled report about an obscure flaw in Symantec's Norton Utilities software after McAfee Associates brought it to their attention. McAfee also created a blatant demonstration program showing how to attack computers running Norton Utilities. In return for these favors, Windows Sources posted the demo code on their website for all to see.

Symantec berated Windows Sources for providing McAfee's code to any malicious hacker who wanted it. Product manager Tom Andrus told Associated Press: "we were taken aback that [McAfee] would go to the press, create something akin to a virus and then basically show the world how to do that." Chagrined editors at Windows Sources quietly pulled McAfee's code from their website the next day.

But Windows Sources continues to run the "investigative report" on its website. And they want you to understand the dangerous threat they created when they released the Trojan to evil hackers worldwide. We quote:

There are preventative measures users can take to protect themselves. Following one of these five steps will help protect your system from the effects of the toxic software combination:
  1. Download the patch from Symantec
  2. Uninstall Norton Utilities
  3. Disable support for ActiveX-scripting in Internet Explorer
  4. Switch to a non-ActiveX-based browser such as Netscape's Navigator,
  5. Stay off the Net.
Option 4 doesn't hold much water -- a third-party developer recently announced an ActiveX plug-in for Netscape. The nomination committee prefers options 2 and 5: you can always throw away your money by throwing away Norton Utilities, or you can simply stop using the Internet. Think of the benefits if you never receive email again!

Actually, option 5 makes sense. Windows Sources reporters can't attack your computer with a Trojan if you choose to stay off the Internet...

Joel J. Smith (15 votes)

"The world's most famous computer bug -- the Michelangelo virus -- is set to ravage unprotected computer systems Thursday." So begins Smith in his mind-numbed report about Michelangelo (itself a runner-up in the "event" category). Smith identifies some important points in his story. For example, did you know "savvy users... keep their machine turned off March 6"? (Savvy computer users keep their computers free of viruses, but let's not digress.)

Did you know "the virus wreaked havoc in the computer world when it surfaced in 1991"? (Hysteria didn't mount until the beginning of 1992, but let's not digress.) And did you know "the virus [was] probably written by a computer student in Taiwan"? (Um... well, let's not digress.)

AsiaInfo Services (8 votes)

China, as you know, recently reached the "lightspeed" communications age when it linked itself to the Internet. On March 26, the AsiaInfo China Daily News reported "McAfree Corp" [sic] had discovered the ShareFun.A virus.

McAfee Associates (correct spelling) issued its "ShareFun.A" press release on February 24. Knowing the distance from California to China and dividing by the time lag, the speed of light calculates out to ... roughly 25 feet per second!

Rene Deger (6 votes)

This reporter for PC Week Online wrote a story about "a mysterious virus that prevents [the] Windows operating system from recognizing the presence of a CD-ROM" on certain new computers. Unlike most viruses, Deger's story claims you can eradicate it by "running a DOS command twice, which then prompts the [Windows device] drivers to recognize one another."

Actually, it sounds more like a hardware or software conflict, not a "mysterious virus." Deger then switches gears, claiming computer engineers have looked at various hardware & software conflicts as a possible cause for the CD-ROM problem. The story never mentions anyone actually searching for a mysterious virus...

(return to top)

Total votes accepted: 198

Rejected votes:

4 employees affiliated with a nominee
13 failed to provide a valid Internet address
2 "cemetery" ballots (voted in another's name)
4 duplicate ballots stuffed into the ballot box
12 blank ballots
Please note: some people failed to vote in all categories.
Top of page Home page Index page No frames Thinkers' page Copyright info Website awards Download stuff 1996 CVHA 1996 CVHA
email